LA County redistricting is out of the hands of the supervisors. Here’s why that matters – Daily News

When it involves redrawing Los Angeles County’s political boundaries, this year is a primary.

The yet-to-be-finalized new maps — which decide which communities shall be represented by who on the Board of Supervisors — are in the hands of an unbiased Citizens Redistricting Commission, a 14-member board charged with listening to the public and making a closing map, primarily based on the newest Census figures. The act was as soon as the area of the supervisors, however not any extra.

There’s a lot at stake for the nascent board, which final week launched new mapping software the public can use to recommend and submit its own maps.

“We want to show a citizen commission can do the work,” mentioned Gayla Kraetsch Hartsough, govt director of the fee, who is tasked with managing the board, and ensuring it stays on observe to satisfy a Dec. 15 deadline for what the county’s new supervisorial districts will appear like. “If it’s to continue, we really are setting a precedent of how to do it. It’s my hope we get it right and this becomes the prevailing way we do it 10 years from now.”

Slowed by the pandemic and a delayed 2020 Census, the course of is no much less essential, specialists say.

“It has immense importance toward giving minorities the ability to equally proceed in the future and in the sharing of power in L.A. County,” mentioned Alan Clayton, a redistricting skilled. “There’s nothing more important in terms of giving minorities an opportunity to be part of the American dream than redistricting.”

In principle, the fee represents a big change. Every 10 years earlier than this year, it was the supervisors who drew the strains between their districts, a course of which for many years was characterised by political dealmaking and self-preservation.

But in 2016, the state Legislature handed Senate Bill 958, which aimed to deliver the county’s redistricting procedures in keeping with the statewide system established by voters in 2008 by way of Proposition 11. The thought was to encourage good authorities reform and take election rule-setting from the hands of self-interested elected officers.

As the fee races towards its December deadline for a map to be launched to the public, right here is a primer explaining the complicated course of.


At the L.A. County degree, it is the redrawing of  the county’s supervisorial districts primarily based on Census information each 10 years. So, this year, the redraw is primarily based on 2020 Census information and public enter. That redraw basically would create 5 revised supervisorial districts that replicate the modifications in inhabitants and demographics  that have occurred in the present districts over the final 10 years.

The redrawing should fall beneath the federal Voting Rights Act. The county’s 5 supervisorial districts should:

  • Be geographically linked;
  • Be drawn in order to attenuate dividing cities, neighborhoods, or communities of curiosity’
  • Not be “gerrymandered,” that is, drawn to favor any political faction, occasion or officeholder; and
  • Include about 2 million individuals every.


“Power flows from redistricting,” Clayton mentioned. “L.A. County has over 10 million individuals in it. We’d be like the 8th-largest state in the country. How that population’s numbers get broken down into districts determines who has influence in L.A. County.”

Clayton, lengthy an skilled in how the county attracts its strains, himself has submitted a map for the fee’s consideration, primarily based on modifications in the inhabitants.

Under his calculations:

  • Janice Hahn’s Fourth District would grow to be extra Latino;
  • Hilda Solis’ First District would cede areas of the San Gabriel Valley and take over areas of the northeast San Fernando Valley; and
  • Kathryn Barger’s fifth District to signify extra areas in the San Gabriel Valley together with giant Asian American communities.

Clayton’s map is only one configuration amongst many proposals submitted to the fee. But it illustrates potential energy blocs in the metropolis and the way inhabitants shifts would possibly have an effect on who runs for office, or who stays in office.


The county Board of Supervisors used to redraw the maps for supervisorial districts. Zev Yaroslavsky, who as a metropolis councilman after which a supervisor from the Eighties by way of 2000s, mentioned the course of had its “pluses and minuses.”

It may very well be “ugly,” he mentioned, as “people who make the decisions have a very profound, and emotional stake in it.” But choices have been additionally being made by individuals who knew and understood the implications of redrawing the strains. He famous that in more moderen years, lawmakers have been conscious of operating afoul of the Voting Rights Act. Technology, he mentioned, has additionally improved the course of, and made it extra clear.

Going again a number of a long time earlier than Yaroslavsky’s tenure, courts chronicled the county’s checkered previous in terms of “intentional discrimination.”

In 1990, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld U.S. District Court Judge David V. Kenyon’s ruling that that the County Board of Supervisors discriminated towards Latinos when it drew district strains in 1981 in East L.A. and the San Gabriel Valley.

The Latino neighborhood “has sadly been denied an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and to elect candidates of their choice to the Board of Supervisors for this burgeoning county,” Kenyon wrote in his June 4, 1990 decision. The choose didn’t cease there. He went on to chronicle related gerrymandering in 1959, 1965, 1971 and 1981.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to listen to the county’s 1990 attraction in Yolanda Garza v. County of Los Angeles, forcing the board to just accept the county’s first Latino-majority district in additional than a century and paving the manner for Gloria Molina to win the 1st District seat in a particular election.


Well, it virtually didn’t. Then state Sen. Ricardo Lara’s SB 958 didn’t sit effectively with the county when it was launched in 2016.

Along with taking management of redistricting from the supervisors, it required the political occasion preferences of the fee’s members to be “as proportional as possible to the the total number of voters who are registered with each political party in the county.”

That contrasted with the residents fee that units state Assembly and Senate districts made up of 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans and 4 independents. The county sued, claiming the regulation unconstitutional, unfairly singled out L.A. County, and injected partisanship into formally non-partisan native authorities. The county mentioned it might depart the panel with none members who aren’t registered with a celebration.

But a Superior Court choose sided towards the county, saying that the regulation “seeks to create an impartial independent commission” and doesn’t goal to “impose a particular political viewpoint.”


In September 2020, the county registrar narrowed 741 purposes to the 60 most certified and despatched them to the controller, who randomly chosen one commissioner for every of the 5 districts. The controller chosen one other three. The eight commissioners then chosen one other six.

The county employed Kraetsch Hartsough’s agency, KH Consulting Group, to run the workers. The agency has has labored with a number of public sector companies.


Given the regulation’s emphasis on proportionality, the fee is balanced towards Democrats: Seven Democrats, three Republicans and 4 who’re both No Party Preference or affiliated with different political events.

“I am happy to say that, although our Commission has a mixture of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents and a diversity of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, and age, we have operated in a collegial and constructive manner, with an understanding that our task is bigger than any person, political party, or community,” mentioned Commission Co-Chair Daniel M. Mayeda in a written assertion.



Among specialists there’s a way that such a physique can’t be completely apolitical.

“No matter who does it, it is a political process,” mentioned Yaroslavsky, who in 2000 and 2010 as supervisor for the Third District drew the strains together with his fellow supervisors. “The question is who has the most to gain from it.”

There are often winners and losers, so the course of will be contentious.

“It is not enough to pull power away from legislatures,” mentioned Douglas M. Spencer, affiliate professor of regulation at the University of Colorado, who manages the weblog All About Redistricting. “The institutional design details of commissions are very important and, in general, the more institutionally independent, the more functional the process and fair the outcomes.”

On the state degree, Spencer lauded California, which he mentioned labored effectively in the 2010 redistricting cycle, and the Colorado fee for its work throughout the present election cycle.

But not all unbiased commissions “are created equal,” he mentioned. In New York, for instance, Spencer mentioned half of the commissioners are appointed by state legislative leaders. In Virginia, half of the members are legislators themselves.

“The results have not been pretty,” he mentioned, noting the New York fee’s lack of ability to agree on a “compromise map” and the Virginia fee’s lack of ability to agree on a agency to generate the map.

At the county degree, specialists agree that the course of is inherently political, however probably much less so than throughout earlier cycles.

“I guarantee you that the commission is well aware of where the incumbent lives, what their districts are,”  mentioned Yaroslavsky. “There’s no manner… in case you are not conscious, you don’t belong on the commissions since you’re not sufficiently curious. How they use that info on a map we’ll see at the finish of the day.

Still, a residents fee may very well be the higher path, some specialists say.

“The fact that a commission has been born is a good thing,” mentioned Jaime Regalado, professor emeritus of political science at Cal State Los Angeles. “It does take it out of the hands of politicians who like to keep their districts strongly intact.”

It’s typically tougher to criticize native commissions for performing in unhealthy religion as a result of native points don’t at all times break down alongside partisan strains, Spencer mentioned. Such choices as the place to place public transit, or whether or not to develop a park, don’t at all times break down alongside occasion strains.


Commission officers say are bracing for the criticism that will inevitably come as the map decisions slender to the closing choice.

One key prong of the course of shall be acquiring a advisor’s evaluation of the racial breakdowns of the map earlier than its finalized,  Kraetsch Hartsough mentioned, noting the must work out any potential authorized vulnerabilities on the “front end” slightly than again finish of the course of.

Commissioner Daniel M. Mayeda say that evaluation shall be the key in figuring out success of the fee.

“I do anticipate that whatever map we end up adopting will draw criticism from various sectors,” mentioned Mayeda mentioned in a  written assertion to this newspaper. “The County is big and complex, and our charge is limited to creating only five districts, so there will be no way to satisfy everyone. But, so long as we’ve done our jobs properly, our final map should be viewed as reasonable and justified. ”


The fee has held 12 public hearings. The subsequent common fee meeting is at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 13.

The purpose to this point: Gather enter about attainable “communities of interest,” outlined as a contiguous populations sharing social and financial pursuits that ought to be included inside a single district.”

For occasion, José Cornejo mentioned he’d wish to see the complete San Fernando Valley as its personal neighborhood of curiosity.

“What I’m hoping for is that the Valley gets its own district,” he mentioned. “We’ve always been divided and split up. Would be nice rather than two, as it always has been divided.”

He pointed to a survey of 500 voters in state Senate District 18 displaying that the majority in the survey additionally most well-liked “essentially having its own supervisor.” As it is, Sheila Kuehl represents a lot of the Valley but additionally represents a strong portion on the westside of LA. And Kathryn Barger represents parts on the northwest finish of the Valley.

Elsewhere, one group of residents requested that the fee not place Long Beach in a number of supervisorial districts.  Another seeks to maintain collectively the “Gateway Cities” Santa Fe Springs, Whittier, Norwalk, Downey, Artesia and Cerritos.

The timetable forward:

  • This month, the fee will proceed to review maps submitted by the public and shall be drawing up map concepts primarily based on enter from our public hearings.
  • In late October, the fee will establish a number of map choices.
  • In November,  the public will weigh in on the choices. In December, the fee and its workers will additional refine choices for additional remark. On Dec. 15, the fee will vote on the closing map.


Mayeda mentioned the course of shall be successful if the individuals adhere to:

  • Drawing and adopting a closing map of 5 new supervisorial districts;
  • Meeting the statutory deadline of Dec.15, 2021;
  • Complying with each requirement equivalent to well timed hearings throughout which residents get ample enter; and
  • Engaging in a clear course of the place all  choices will be seen and reviewed by the public.


Here’s how:

  • For preliminary public feedback on what communities wish to keep collectively in a single supervisorial district, go here.
  • To obtain free mapping software to submit a map, go here.
  • For a timeline for what’s occurred to this point, go here.
  • For extra info on thestatewide residents redistricign fee, go here
  • For extra info on the commissioners, go here


Comments are closed.