In the face of tremendous public outcry to solve Los Angeles homelessness, almost all of the top candidates for mayor’s office in 2022 agree on at least one: the problem of the thousands of people sleeping in tents and RVs across the city is a crisis, which deserves a disaster-level response.
In general, they agree with most of the voters in a poll released last week that thousands of new beds are needed in a transitional apartment immediately. They said the city needs to continue building permanent housing with around 40,000 homeless people in LA, 70% of whom are unhodged. And they largely agreed that the county’s mental health system needs to work more effectively and be expanded.
It is not entirely clear where all these new transitional apartments are going and how they are to be financed.
Candidates were asked about their plans following the publication of the survey conducted by the Los Angeles Business Council Institute in coordination with The Times. It found that homelessness remains the dominant issue in the region, with 94% of voters viewing homelessness as a serious or very serious problem.
For some, thousands of new tiny homes, rented hotel rooms, and other forms of short-term accommodation where people can get back on their feet is the start.
“I think the first thing that needs to be done urgently is to get people off the streets and make sure the camps are gone,” US MP Karen Bass told the Times.
“To be honest, in our society these are just some of the things you don’t do outside, and sleeping is part of it unless you are camping. So we certainly need more temporary housing and resources should be focused on all of the different strategies that have already been implemented. “
City of Atty. Mike Feuer said he would declare a state of emergency, give the mayor the power to seize buildings and fight the “spread of authority” over the homelessness that plagues the city.
“Among the so-called homeless experts there has long been the view that one focuses first on the chronically homeless and then on everyone else,” said fire. “I do not agree there. I think we should focus on getting as many people off our streets as possible. … I would say the biggest problem is the lack of shelter and shelter for people. “
Public opinion has changed as the crisis deepened as to whether government investment should prioritize temporary housing or long-term housing, with voters in the polls opting for the short-term solutions. On a similarly worded question two years ago, opinions were almost evenly divided.
The city has devoted much attention and resources to building permanent housing for the homeless, which researchers consider to be the most effective means of lifting people out of chronic homelessness.
But politicians and taxpayers have harshly criticized the status quo, where the average cost per unit has soared to more than $ 500,000 and projects often take years to bear fruit.
Bass, Fire, Councilor Kevin de León and Councilor Joe Buscaino are among those who say the city’s immediate focus should be on short-term options that can help get people off the streets as quickly as possible.
For Buscaino this means 7,000 new temporary housing units in the first 18 months of his term of office. Fire believes that around 3,000 new beds are built every year in his first term of office to get everyone who has been rescued from the street.
Bass warned she hadn’t fully worked out the details, but said creating 10,000 new beds sounded like the right number.
All expressed confidence that the federal government’s flood of money, combined with Sacramento’s projected budget surplus of $ 31 billion, could help meet construction costs. People in all types of shelters are still considered homeless; The hope is that they can stay for a relatively short period of time while they stabilize, are connected to services, and find permanent homes.
De León set a goal in January of creating 25,000 new housing units for the homeless by 2025 and advocated creating tiny home villages and buying hotels to retrofit them as homeless shelters.
However, De León drew a sharp line in building new meeting shelters, which in his opinion would be a waste of taxpayers’ money as many people there refuse to accept remittances. Both Fire and Buscaino said the large bunk-bed accommodations still have a place in the homeless reaction.
Like most of the other candidates, Encino entrepreneur Ramit Varma sharply criticized the sluggish and expensive construction development as part of Proposition HHH, the US $ 1.2 billion loan measure approved by the voters in 2016. Varma, who co-founded an online tutoring company and pledged to provide at least $ 1 million of its own money for its campaign, said the city failed by focusing too much on permanent supportive housing.
The city should swiftly expand its temporary housing stock so that those who have recently become homeless or are on the verge of becoming homeless can be protected as soon as possible before further trauma on the streets, he said.
Jessica Lall, President and CEO of Central City Assn. downtown, and Mel Wilson, a San Fernando Valley-based real estate agent and former board member of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, have also made housing and homelessness a central theme of their campaigns.
Wilson, who describes himself as a “housing industry advocate for nearly 30 years,” said he believes the city should incentivize developers to build more affordable housing by waiving fees and dispatching case workers to worthy projects through the often Byzantine permits to direct process.
Wilson also advocated more creativity in the construction process, suggesting that city guides examine, among other things, manufactured residential components for faster construction.
The question of creating temporary housing in the city has been linked in recent months with debates over laws on camping for the homeless.
Buscaino, a former police officer who represents a district stretching from Watts to the Port of Los Angeles, has distinguished himself with tougher talks on the council – calling for a tougher approach to homelessness than many of his peers.
He was the catalyst for the debate and, ultimately, the passage of a law regulating the sitting, sleeping, and storage of property near fire hydrants, building entrances, driveways, libraries, parks, and elementary schools.
The new law – known as “41.18”, based on the section of the municipal code it replaced – created a process in which members can identify problematic camps and pass resolutions to ban them. This included homeless lawyers and certain members of the city council who say the city has made clearing unsightly street camps a priority even when there isn’t enough permanent shelter for the people being moved.
In the latest poll, voters expressed skepticism about clearing camps without offering people a place. A majority of respondents indicated that after a camp is cleared, the homeless are most likely to move to other camps in the area rather than finding or permanent shelter or leaving the area.
A federal court order in Boise, Idaho set a precedent restricting enforcement of anti-camping regulations unless accommodation is available. This ruling has influenced the debates about how enforcement should be carried out in the city.
The other councilor in the running – De León, a former Senate chairman who represents a district that includes downtown LA and much of the East Side – voted for the targeted anti-camping ordinance, but believes it will be used more sparingly should.
“When you wander around town 41:18, you’re just moving people around,” De León said, likening mass penetration without adequate housing to a game of musical chairs that inevitably leaves many without a place.
Bass reiterated that sentiment, saying that by empowering individual councilors, the city is not seeing homelessness as the regional problem it has become.
“The idea that it is parish by parish renders a city-wide and county-wide approach superfluous, in my opinion,” said Bass.
She said that there should be rules for the lives of people on the street and that an increased number of city-funded social workers should go ahead – even if the police are still involved, but in the background.
Buscaino said that the range should be extended, but nobody is allowed to sleep on the street: “For those who do not want to accept help, we cannot give up these people, but at the same time we need standards on our streets.”
Buscaino is also pushing for a vote in front of voters in November that would completely rule out homeless camps in public spaces.
Feuer, who helped draft these much-debated ordinances as a prosecutor, said he doesn’t like using resolutions to cordon off certain parts of the city. However, he supported categorical sleep bans in certain locations such as near existing homeless shelters, saying that if they believe large camps will follow, it is unlikely that communities will approve new shelter in their neighborhood.
Fire was also unhappy with the work of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, saying that this shared-power agency, with both city and county funding, is an outdated and ineffective model. He said he wasn’t sure yet what the best alternative was and that the city should work to find a better model if it does decide to pull out.
Buscaino urged the city to pull out of LAHSA, saying it should set up its own agency that would be accountable to the council. Other candidates have raised the possibility of leaving LAHSA, but not in such definitive terms.
Lall has suggested setting up a citywide health department and possibly moving mental health services to the city’s jurisdiction as well.
The downtown store manager said her decision to run was partly shaped by the death of her younger brother, who suffered from substance abuse and mental health problems that eventually cost him his life.
“I know that no one can really get better in a tent and we need to improve in terms of providing shelter and services and acting with much greater urgency,” Lall said.